Who wouldn't want to change the world? We all know the problems: pollution, poverty, disease, war and more. We're confronted by them every day. For some of us, it is a constant barrage of "bad news". For many, these problems are not abstract, but a part of their everyday life.
The goal of this blog will be to explore some of these problems, look at what is being done about them and begin a new conversation on how to move forward to a new and brighter future. If you are looking for answers, good luck on your search. There are no answers here, at least not yet.
As a starting point, consider why these problems haven't already been solved. Conspiracy theories aside, there aren't large shadow organizations dedicated to the perpetuation of poverty or disease (war is subject to some debate...) Instead, these ills are side-effects of our lifestyles, cultures and institutions. So the answer is simple. Just change the underlying model that creates all of this misery.
When looked at on the grand scale, the problem seems insurmountable. How can we change the very fabric of society? Fortunately, there are many dedicated people that are tackling the issues. They make a difference in the ways that they can: working at a soup kitchen, providing free medical care or legal services, drinking filtered water from a reusable container, taking public transit. Others, with more means, are going after even bigger challenges: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, supplemented by incredible generosity from Warren Buffett, is working on AIDS and other endemic problems. The Tiger Woods Foundation and Oprah Winfrey have devoted fortunes to education and the welfare of children. All of these efforts are both laudable and important. They make the world a better place.
In our world of instant gratification, the question remains: "Are we there yet?" Of course, the answer is a resounding "No." In fact, it would not be difficult to find those who think that we are moving in the wrong direction. In spite of everyone's efforts, we are actually losing ground. The reason is that the foundation is working against success. Civilization has built up a huge amount of inertia, and changing it will not be easy. Many of the very institutions that we have formed to protect our interests (mostly governmental), have become calcified. Polarized viewpoints struggle with each other until the result is stalemate.
In the recent global financial meltdown, the concept has been floated that certain organizations are "Too Big to Fail". They are so critical to the infrastructure of society (at least the financial sector) that their collapse would have ripple effects that would magnify that failure. Perhaps it is time to invert that logic and look at structures that are "Too Big to Succeed". Currently, the United States government is attempting to address a host of issues that are monumental in their scope. Financial system reform, health care reform, taxation, foreign wars, energy policy and more are being tackled in the worst global financial situation in recent memory. Some have criticized the sweeping nature of suggested reforms, preferring smaller, incremental steps. It can also be argued that these reforms do not go far enough. The interconnected nature of our world makes changes to any one institution very difficult. When one change is made, it upsets the existing equilibrium of the whole and a host of unintended consequences follow.
As an initial point of discussion, consider the proposition that in order to create a stable solution, it will be necessary to change the entire structure at once. Such a global change is naturally impossible. Imagine simultaneously changing the legal, governmental, financial, transportation, healthcare and communications systems of the United States. In order to avoid fulfilling ancient prophecies, please do not schedule this for 2012. One solution is to isolate and completely change smaller units, expanding the changes to ever-larger groups until eventually the entire system is transformed. In addition to allowing the changes to be accomplished in manageable chunks, this approach would allow "test implementations" that could be used as a proof of concept. The first efforts might be a laboratory to test ideas and to design a working model. Failure would not be fatal, but only instructional. Paraphrasing Thomas Edison "At least we know one thing that doesn't work".
Our goal then, becomes two-fold: Design the model that will be tested, and come up with a way to actually realize that model. Over the next few weeks, the tools will be made available to start the discussions and to engage those who have the passion and knowledge to create the concept. If you would like to participate, check back at this blog. Be prepared though, you will also need enough strength of your convictions to follow through on the final design. Would you invest in such a model, or even live there?
No comments:
Post a Comment